"The woman who is truly Spirit-filled will want to be totally submissive to her husband . . . This is a truly liberated woman. Submission is God's design for women."BEVERLY LAHAYE, The Spirit-Controlled WomanOne evening in 1978 Beverly LaHaye was watching television with her husband. On the tube Barbara Walters was interviewing the feminist leader Betty Friedan, who suggested that she represented many women in America.
According to the story that LaHaye has repeated countless times, she immediately sprang to her feet and declared, "Betty Friedan doesn't speak for me and I bet she doesn't speak for the majority of women in this country."
From that day on, or so the story goes, she vowed to rally other "submissive" women who believed, like her, that "the women's liberation movement is destroying the family and threatening the survival of our nation." (1)
Betty LaHaye's husband is Religious Right leader, Tim LaHaye, co-author of the successful Apocalyptic Left Behind book series. He is also a founder of the Council for National Policy, where Harper gave his 1997 speech, where he vilified Canadians and our socialist ways.
Betty LaHaye's "submissive awakening" was in direct contrast to what she had been preaching several years before. Then as a pastor's wife, raising four children, she felt unfulfilled and hated the drudgery of her day to day existence.
One very well-meaning lady said to me in the early days of our ministry, "Mrs. LaHaye, our last pastor's wife was an author; what do you do?" That was a heavy question for a fearful twenty-seven-year-old woman to cope with. And I began to wonder, "What did I do?" Oh yes, I was a good mother to my four children, I could keep house reasonably well, my husband adored me, but what could I do that would be eternally effective in the lives of other women? The answer seemed to come back to me. "Very little!" There was something missing in my life.So despite the fact that her children were still young, she returned to work full-time, as a teletype operator for Merrill Lynch. This job she claimed helped her to "gain confidence" and fulfilment.
In my case it was not the major problems that succeeded in wearing me down; it was the smoldering resentment caused from the endless little tasks that had to be repeated over and over again and seemed so futile. Day after day I would perform the same routine procedures: picking up dirty socks, hanging up wet towels, closing closet doors, turning off lights that had been left on, creating a path through the clutter of toys. (1)
By 1978 her children were grown and forgetting her life before Merrill Lynch, she decided that she would be the voice of submissive women everywhere.
Lahaye helped to form the group 'Concerned Women for America', drafting women's policy for the Neoconservative/Religious Right movement. CWA also sparked similar organisations in other countries, including our own version 'Real Women of Canada', who have worked in Harper's various parties from the beginning of Reform.
A branch group of Real Women, Alberta Federation of Women United for Families, helped to get Conservative MP Rob Anders elected.
Members of Concerned Women, regularly speak at Real Women conventions, and Canadian members return the favour.
In fact several Conservative MPs have also made the trek to Betty LaHaye's anti-feminist kingdom, including Vic Toews and Stockwell Day.
Given this kind of support for anti-feminism, should we really be surprised that the Republicans are attacking any funding to vulnerable women? That Harper's tax policies ignore single mothers, and pander only to high income households with one wage earner? Or that the Neoconservative government of David Cameron in the UK, is also targeting women in their "austerity" budgets?
This all began when stocking footed Betty LaHaye stood up and vowed to offer an alternative voice for women, who could find happiness if they would just totally submit to their menfolk.
So kick off those shoes ladies and get back in the kitchen where you belong.
As for me, I'm experiencing a case of the vapours. Could just be that my corset's too tight.
Sources:
1. Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women, By Susan Faludi, Crown publishing, 1991, ISBN: 0-385-42507-4, Pg. 247-249
One of Harper's top theocons is my very own MP, David Sweet. Here's a sample, http://web.archive.org/web/20030518020552/http://www.christianweek.org/Stories/vol15/no16/story4.html
ReplyDeleteThis anti-woman thing makes me feel bilious, Emily. It's hard to believe there are even men who think that way, never mind women. Where are their heads at? Very, very disturbing, very much so.
ReplyDeleteSure, some kinds of progress have gotten us into a helluva mess in many ways, destroying the planet and all, but women's rights were positive progress, and a long time coming.
It's not so long ago women weren't even consider people, never mind voters. Women were chattels, belonging to their fathers or their husbands. What woman could possibly, in her right mind, want to go back to that?
Throughout history, women have been the civilizing element of society (with some exceptions, I admit). Some men forgot that they were born from a woman, a woman who taught them care, love, good manners, kindness to others. Some men did and still do the same. And when international institutions admit that the development of poor countries is unthinkable without women getting involved in every aspects of life and society, it does say a lot about their role.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post! I wonder if Charles McVety attends these conventions too?
ReplyDeleteBrilliant post Emily.
ReplyDeleteAnd it really makes me wonder more and more about Laureen Harper.