In October of 2006, an American journalist visiting Canada noticed that something was not right. He had been making the trip every year, but this time there was a marked difference.
Something he was all too familiar with in the United States. Visceral politics.
As an American journalist visiting my wife's relatives in Canada, I've always been struck by how ardently the country's political discourse focused on substance — the budget, health care, schools, roads — with little of the cheap theatrics and angry divisiveness of U.S. politics and punditry. Reading and listening to the Canadian news media during those family trips could be a tad boring, but it also was touching, like remembering your earnest grade-school civics teacher lecturing about the wonders of the American democratic process.And he knew the cause:
But in my visit this past summer, I noticed that the tone of Canada suddenly had changed. There was a nastier edge to the commentary. There were not-so-subtle appeals to racism and xenophobia, references to Muslim neighbourhoods in Quebec as “Quebecistan” and to Lebanese-Canadians as “Hezbocrats,” a play on the Muslim group Hezbollah. To someone who has covered U.S. politics for three decades, there was a shock of recognition. Standing out starkly against the bland traditions of Canadian governance was the pugnacious 'tude of American political combat, wedge issues pounded in with a zeal that put the goal of winning and holding power over everything else. (An American journalist's view of Harper, By Richard Fricker, October 18, 2006)
For inspiration in building a new brand of Canadian conservatism, Harper looked to Washington, where Rep. Newt Gingrich, R-Georgia, was promoting a combative style designed to shatter the longtime Democratic grip on the U.S. House of Representatives.What Fricker didn't know though, was that Newt Gingrich actually took his inspiration from Preston Manning and Stephen Harper during their Reform Party days. We exported this.
Linda McQuaig rightfully suggests, that the rampant spread of right-wing extremist rhetoric, is partly the fault of the media who give it a platform. They not only condone it but encourage it, cheering from the sidelines when people like John Baird and Pierre Poilievre are at their worst.
Peter Worthington also weighed in. It was kind of funny though because when I read the headline: Peter Worthington: A nutbar who couldn’t be stopped, I thought it was someone writing about Peter Worthington. That man spews so much poison it's embarrassing.
A war supporter who once suggested that Afghan prisoners were not our responsibility, forgetting something called the Geneva Convention.
There's no argument that the Reform movement brought ugly politics into Canada. Yes before that election campaigns were heated, but once over everyone rolled up their sleeves and got to work.
But the neoconservative strategy is to keep political strategists on the government payroll, and they are the ones who make all the decisions, based on what is more politically beneficial to their party, and not what's good for the country.
It's time to put some civility back into politics. Not too much or nothing would get done.
I'm going to share one of my favourite videos. It's Dalton Camp, a former Conservative party insider, from Canada's original Conservative party. That party dissolved in 2003, and it's a shame. I miss it. The late Dalton Camp wrote often, warning about the neoconservative movement, and how it would destroy us.
We should have listened.
That video made me cry, Emily. I remember when journalism in Canada was pretty much the way Dalton Camp said it should be. I'm forever grateful to have met many of his contemporaries, men and women I could admire for their honesty in journalism.
ReplyDeleteI also remember when Canadians, as he said, weren't bloody-minded. Now so many Canadians are just that, their bloody-mindedness deliberately whipped into a fury by dishonest media.
Well put Kay
ReplyDeleteI had the extreme and unforgettable pleasure of being in the company of Dalton Camp on more than one occasion.It was at the summer residence of the late, and great Senator Finlay MacDonald. Also in attendance was Senator Norm Atkins. As a working stiff I was always in awe at these relaxed meetings with these friendly, welcoming, gentlemen. The conversations were always engaging and often about anything and everything. I couldnt get over the fact that these men had an interest in my opinion and never was the conversation remotely partisan. Even though didn't sit on their side of the fence politically it was never perceived as evident and opinion meant everything. I even remember Senator Finlay Mac in "93" saying that we had just elected a man who was going to be the best Prime Minister we had seen in a long time. How non partisan and respectful of the process is that? Those three great men , all deceased now, echo a past time when this country was truly great along with the people directing it. I wonder what the conversation would be like reguarding the present time and those directing it? Even though I have never been of the conservative persuasion and voted only once for them and the wrong man in "84" I recocnize great men and great builders of this country and the once great party of Sir John A.
ReplyDeleteI have tears too.So sad!
ReplyDeleteHow can we restore honest debate & exchange of ideas?
Some Politicians to-day have no shame & lie with glee.
Who Killed Canada
ReplyDeleteMedia Ownership and the Radical Right in Canada
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8D67YiLcOM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiurWhmOIgk&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRnZ43wxGvY&NR=1
Part 1, 2 & 3. Note: each video about 10 minutes long
.
.
.
..