Another Plank of the Conservative Campaign Just Splintered

Jason Kenney was on a radio station today to talk about his government's "Human smuggling" initiative, another cornerstone of their campaign. But instead it just angered people who found the entire thing a little offensive.

Human smuggling is an important issue but not something you want to run up and down squawking about. The bill he accuses Ignatieff and his "reckless coalition" of opposing, included the right to imprison women and children for up to a year.

Canada has always been a safe place for those fleeing oppression, and many people have bought their way to safety. But this is starting to look like a witch hunt.

Andre Gerolymatos has come to Kenney's defense, but he's an employee so it doesn't count.

Can't wait to see what they're going to announce tomorrow.

Students Greet Harper in Guelph with Message: You're Going Down

Students at the University of Guelph met Stephen Harper today with a warning.

They will be voting.

Look out Harper. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. I wouldn't want you suing us ... again!

The Tea Party Must be Writing Harper's Policies. Why Would Women Ever Vote For Harper or the GOP?

Dennis Gruending provided a list of all the agencies attacked by Stephen Harper. This week Bill Maher discussed all the agencies the Tea Party/Republicans want to axe.

Darn it all if the lists are not the same. Different agency names, but the same theme. Planned parenthood, education, the arts, public broadcasting (CBC), healthcare, poverty.

But the real hit list for both is women. Women with jobs. Radical feminists with jobs. Radical feminists who wish they could find a job.

Republican Officials Cut Head Start Funding, Saying Women Should Be Married And Home With Kids.

Harper's family tax plan, that kicks in about the same time as I enter a retirement home .... who am I trying to kid? I'll never be able to afford a retirement home ... about the same time as I'm living in the car in my son's driveway ... also just benefits married couples. And then only if the main "bread winner" earns a cazillion dollars a year.

Do you think they sit down together over .. hmmm tea .. and carve out their policies on a clay tablet?

Stephen Harper Trying to Muzzle Detainee Report. What's he Afraid of?

It would appear that Stephen Harper is again refusing to be accountable to Canadians, about what he knew and when, of the abuse of Afghan Detainees:

The Conservative government quietly went to Federal Court last week hoping to impose limits on what a military watchdog can say in its final report into torture allegations involving Afghan prisoners. The Military Police Complaints Commission is currently reviewing evidence and writing its report after hearings into allegations that army cops turned a blind eye to suspected abuse in Afghan jails.

Federal lawyers successfully argued in 2009 that the commission's investigation of complaints launched by Amnesty International and the B.C. Civil Liberties Association should be limited to what military police knew — or should have known — about possible torture of prisoners by Afghan jailers. The Harper government went even further last week in two days of hearings and challenged the definition of what military cops could have known.

Same old, same old.

Speaking the Language of Science, not the Language of Neoconservatism

Our local Liberal candidate in Kingston, Ted Hsu, said something in an introductory speech recently that I found compelling.

A man with both an economic and environmental background, he told us that he is fluent in English, French, Mandarin and the language of science. And I realized just how important that was.

All professionals become fluent in the language of their craft. Whether it's computer-speak, medical terminology or whatever, it is the language that allows them to interact with their peers.

Gary Goodyear, the Conservative Science Minister, does not speak the language of science. In fact, he doesn't really believe in science at all, or at least not in evolution, one of the fundamentals of science.

So how does he communicate with stakeholders? Being a neoconservative, there's really only one word he needs to understand: "no".

Because this is a government that does not appreciate science, and does not feel that it's something government should be worried about, despite the fact that it plays an integral role in most aspects of our lives.

Marc Garneau, the Liberal science critic, was an astronaut and the first Canadian in space. He understands not only the language, but the importance of science.

In his new book Rogue in Power, Christian Nadeau is also concerned with the course of action that the Harper government is taking.

In the field of science, the Conservatives also show their mistrust towards anything that could run counter to their traditionalist convictions. There have been some astonishing statements, too embarrassing to be really funny, such as Science Minister Gary Goodyear's remark to a Globe and Mail interviewer who asked him if he accepted Darwin's theory of evolution. The minister refused to answer, citing religious reasons. His ambiguous retractions later on were not of a sort that would reassure the scientific community.

It would be simplistic, however, to put all the Conservatives who are close to Harper together in the same creationist basket. What is most striking is not so much the statements and shocking revelations regarding members of Harper's team, but rather its persistence in treating the scientific world and basic research as something of secondary importance. It is hard to understand the Conservatives' disdain. This attitude could be explained in part by their religious convictions or antiscientific prejudices, but the likeliest hypothesis is that they simply do not see basic science as useful. In the homogeneous moral universe they inhabit, science must not run counter to their concept of good, and it is of interest only if it serves this concept. If it doesn't, it is of little value in their eyes. (1)

He reminds us of the controversy surrounding the Mont-Megantic Observatory, when the government cut the subsidy provided to the observatory by $325,000 while allotting $2million to a consultation process on rebuilding Quebec City's military armoury, clearly showing their priorities. They later reinstated the funding but only on a temporary basis.

I wrote previously of how Christian Paradis is now demanding that all scientific announcements be funnelled through his office, comparing it to Bernhard Rust, the Nazi "man of science", who also ran his department with tight message control.

"Our national policies will not be revoked or modified, even for scientists." Adolf Hitler

We have also learned recently that the government has privatized the National Research Council's government-owned publishing arm, denying free access to many scientific journals.

On May 2 we must learn a new language. It's called the language of saying goodbye to Stephen Harper. We are better than this.

Sources:

1. Rogue in Power: Why Stephen Harper is remaking Canada by Stealth, By Christian Nadeau, Lorimer Press, ISBN: 978-1-55277-730-5, Pg. 86-88.

Canada as a Military Aggressor: Are we Really Prepared for This?

Stephen Harper never liked that Canada was the country that gave the world the Peacekeepers.

He refused to accept that we were a soft power, but was determined to make Canada a nation of warriors.

Following in the footsteps of George Bush, and in fact aping most of Bush's rhetoric, including "cut and run", he made his first foreign visit, a trip to Afghanistan, and one of his first official photo-ops was similar to Bush's with a military plane.



A New Direction for Afghanistan

Though the U.S. led invasion of Afghanistan began on October 7, 2001, Canadian troops did not begin arriving until January of the following year. Then prime minister Jean Chretien, assigned our units to a safer mission, in an attempt to keep them out of harms way, as much as possible.

Then in 2005, General Rick Hillier showed up on the doorstep of a new prime minister Paul Martin, armed with maps and big dreams, claiming that the military were not public servants but that "their job was to kill people".

It was the Martin government that appointed Hillier chief of defence staff and began pumping large amounts of new money into military spending. Soon after his appointment, Hillier began pressuring Martin to agree to U.S. requests to increase and intensify Canadian involvement in the Afghan war. Martin was initially hesitant, but agreed to the deeper commitment in Afghanistan, only after extracting from Hillier a promise that the Canadian military would also have sufficient troops available to participate in vital UN peacekeeping missions. (1)

And according to Stephen Maher in the Chronicle Herald: "In December of 2005, while Canada was in the middle of the election campaign that brought Stephen Harper to power, then-Chief of Defence Staff General Rick Hillier signed a deal establishing our detainee transfer protocol — an arrangement that did not provide for Canadians to monitor their prisoners."

In 2006 Stephen Harper became prime minister, and told Hillier to forget about Peacekeeping. We were warriors. As a result, Canada, the country that created the peacekeepers, now ranks 66th in Peacekeeping efforts. And remember, Peacekeeping isn't about handing out milk and cookies. It is a system that combines combat and diplomacy to reach and protect the world's most vulnerable.

In fact, what Harper did was to move our troops to the most dangerous places in the war, to prove how macho he was. On June 3, 2008; Canada's then Ambassador to Afghanistan, Arif Lalani, was interviewed on a U.S. radio program via telephone. What the morning talk show host, Renee Montagne, wanted to know was why Canada was suffering a disproportionate number of losses in the war. The highest ratio of all NATO forces.

Whenever you hear that a NATO soldier has been killed in the Taliban heartland of Kandahar, it's probably a Canadian soldier. Canada only has 2,500 troops in Afghanistan but they are fighting in one of the most dangerous regions of the country. So while Canadian troops make up only a small fraction of NATO forces, they've suffered the highest number of fatalities proportionately.

Selling a War

Wars have always been a time of propaganda and PR, but the first attempt, at least in modern times, to completely control the message and engineer the selling of war by a government, took place under Dick Cheney when he was Defense Secretary for George Bush Sr. Journalist Arthur Kent*, then with NBC, discusses this in his 1996 book Risk and Redemption.

With everyone from the Joint Chiefs to the lowliest janitor at the Pentagon warning that the American press had to be kept "on side" for this one, and not allowed to repeat the tough coverage of the Vietnam War, Defense Secretary Dick Cheney presided over the most restrictive set of controls ever clamped upon U.S. reporters in time of war. Cheney had a small army of capable public-affairs officers to operate this censorship regime, and as the system took shape in the autumn of '91 there was an astonishing lack of resistance from the chiefs of the big U.S. TV networks, newspapers and wire services. Despite warnings from their correspondents in the field, too many top executives allowed themselves to be smooth-talked and co-opted into believing that the Pentagon would act honourably if and when the whistle blew for total war. The result: coverage packaged by U.S. military authorities. (2)

Stephen Harper also tightly controls the messaging for this war, in what one NATO official described as a 6,000 mile screwdriver. Embedded journalists homogenize the mission, being sure not to report on the civilian casualties, including many children. Canada is also the only country without an independent media there.

But Harper also adopted something else from Dick Cheney. The use of Hill and Knowlton and their Yellow Ribbon campaign. Harper's first defense minister was Gordon O'Connor, a man who had come right from H&K where he lobbied for military contracts, to a position where he determined who actually got military contracts.

And the rehash of the yellow ribbon campaign was brilliant strategy. We no longer questioned what we doing in Afghanistan. We just supported the troops.

Why is This Important?

In his new book, Rogue in Power, Christian Nadeau outlines how Stephen Harper is attempting to recreate Canada in his image of a powerful and warring nation. Not at all who we are.

From its former status as a peacekeeper, Canada has taken on the aura of a militar?istic country, even though it lacks the means. As Louise Arbour, the former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, noted in an October 2009 speech at the Universite de Montreal, our country has switched from a preventive logic, with a major role in UN peacekeeping missions, to a warrior logic, turned increasingly towards NATO. (3)

Canada has already lost its moral voice in the world.

It was learned in November that DND was recruting soldiers on soft porn sites:

In advertising its recruitment drive to 18-to-34-year-olds, DND received quite a few hits from a placement on hollywoodtuna.com, a tamer site featuring Britney Spears’ “Nasty Panty Flash,” Blake Lively’s “Kinda See Through” dress and photos of Rihanna suggestively touching herself. DND also bought keyword search terms for their online advertisement, including “James bond girls,” “poor man’s James bond” and “can t find a jobs.”

Is this the best place to recruit our soldiers?

We are becoming increasingly isolated, as evidenced by our loss of the UN Security Council Seat.

Is this really how we view our country?

Imagine if you will for a moment, Stephen Harper returning to power after the upcoming election. The voices of those who oppose his style of government will be silenced for a very long time. It won't matter if he only has a minority, Parliament will be rendered nonfunctional. Harper controls the Senate, who have been putting a stop to any bills he doesn't like.

We saw this with both the Climate Change and generic drugs for Africa, passed by our ELECTED representatives, but rubber stamped DENIED by unelected political operatives.

The Opposition will be impotent, because they wouldn't dare force another election, no matter what he did.

This is not about simply denying him a majority. He's had one for five years. It's about not giving him a mandate, and every effort must be made to ensure that happens.

It's up to us to get everyone we know to vote. Arrange rides if you have to, anything short of kidnapping. And make sure that everyone votes smart. Catch 22 Harper Conservatives are promoting strategic voting and can provide a lot of useful information to be sure that our votes count.

This is not a time for partisan chest thumping, because the outcome on May 2, will set the course for this country. We can continue on the one set by Harper, or that desired by most Canadians.

Footnotes:

*Arthur Kent is the younger brother of Conservative MP Peter Kent. He has been openly critical of the Harper government.

Sources:

1. HOLDING THE BULLY'S COAT, Canada and the U.S. Empire, Linda McQuaig, Doubleday Canada, ISBN 978-0-385-66012-9, pg. 73-74

2. Risk and Redemption: Surviving the Network News Wars. By Arthur kent, Viking Press, 2006, Isbn: 0-670-86672-5, Pg. 135.

3. Rogue in Power: Why Stephen Harper is remaking Canada by Stealth, By Christian Nadeau, Lorimer Press, ISBN: 978-1-55277-730-5, Pg. 130

Stephen Harper Finally Says Something Intelligent in His Answer to Terry Milewski

Harper challenging and then backing down from a one on one debate with Michael Ignatieff is not making him appear like the tough guy he tries to portray. Rick Mercer tweeted: "When Harper challenged Iggy to debate I missed part where he said in 2015 when debt erased."

Stephen Harper is ignoring the ongoing calls for him to debate Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff one on one. CBC comedian Rick Mercer over the weekend offered to moderate a debate between the two leaders. Other organizations have put their names forward as well, including a public-policy group called Canada2020 that is connected with former CBC host Don Newman. Ignatieff has accepted Mercer's offer. But Harper said he's moved on. "The train has left the station," the Conservative leader told reporters in Ottawa on Sunday.

His answer above sounds more intelligent.